Nick Diaz UFC 129Nick Diaz is still awaiting his day in front of the Nevada State Athletic Commission to answer to the charges of a positive test for marijuana stemming from his fight at UFC 143 in early February, but his lawyer, Ross Goodman, is firing back at the commission after recent statements made towards his client.

In a statement made to Yahoo! Sports in March, Jennifer Lopez, public information officer for the Nevada attorney general said, “Not only did Nick Diaz violate the law by testing positive for marijuana metabolites, but he also lied to the Commission on his Pre-Fight Questionnaire when he swore that he had not used any prescribed medications in two weeks before the fight.”

Now Goodman has fired back with a new document filed to the Attorney General’s office dated from April 11, with a response in regards to Diaz’s alleged falsification of the pre-fight questionnaire.

Goodman states that the “complaint does not allege any facts support that Diaz violated a rule.”

The document goes on to state that the “after the fact allegations impugning Diaz’s character serve to distract from the core issue that Nevada does not prohibit inactive marijuana metabolites.”

The statement once again points out, as in the original complaint, that marijuana metabolites are not a prohibited substance under the rules adapted by the Nevada State Athletic Commission from WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency).

The second part of the document filed on Wednesday answers the charge from the Attorney General’s office that Diaz lied on his original fight application filled out prior to his bout with Carlos Condit in February.

The document states “Diaz met the required standard, reasonable interpretation of commonly understood phrases to the best of his knowledge.” This is in reference to Diaz not disclosing any usage of medicinal marijuana on his pre-fight medical questionnaire.

As it has been well documented in the past, Diaz is legally allowed to use medicinal marijuana in his home state of California, but in all of the court documents filed thus far by Goodman, it states he cuts off his usage of the drug eight days prior to competition. The marijuana metabolites that he tested positive for are allegedly leftover in fat cells, that can show up on tests months after usage and should have no bearing on Diaz in his fight or drug testing results from the commission.

As far as his pre-fight questionnaire, Goodman argues that when Diaz did not list medicinal marijuana, he was not providing “false or misleading information,” but it was the questionnaire itself that has to be brought under fire for wording that did not define exactly what they were looking for.

“In the absence of prescribed definitions, Diaz relied on the general understanding of the terms ‘prescribed medications,’ ‘over the counter medications,’ and ‘serious medical illness.’”

The statement made says “there is no evidence to suggest that Diaz knowingly provided false information.”

Goodman points to the fact that medicinal marijuana is not a prescription drug or an over the counter drug, nor did Diaz believe his ADHD (attention deficit hyper activity disorder) was classified as a “serious illness.” (Diaz’s approved medicinal marijuana usage was because he was diagnosed with ADHD).

Diaz’s medicinal marijuana usage, while approved by a doctor, is only “recommended” as treatment by a physician, not actually a prescription drug that he would pick up at a pharmacy. Same as the argument for the over the counter drugs, as the statement says Diaz would assume it meant something that was picked up at a store like Walgreens or CVS.

Whether these arguments will actually lead to any kind of dismissal of the charges or allegations against Diaz remains to be seen, but Goodman closes his statement by saying, “unless Diaz’s interpretations of ‘serious medical illness,’ ‘prescribed medication,’ and ‘over the counter medication or product’ are so clearly wrong as to constitute sufficient proof of bad faith intent to deceive, the Commission must dismiss the allegations.”

Now it just appears to be a matter of time before Diaz gets his hearing in front of the Nevada Athletic Commission to ultimately decide on his punishment. Diaz was previously suspended in Nevada for a positive drug test for marijuana and was sentenced to a six-month suspension.

Typically in past cases like this, a second offense has landed an athlete with a one-year suspension from the Nevada Commission. It remains to be seen if that will be the same doled out for Diaz, or if his lawyer’s arguments will somehow save him from that or some other fate.

Follow @DamonMartin on Twitter or e-mail Damon Martin.
For more
UFC News and UFC Rumors, follow MMAWeekly.com on Twitter and Facebook.

view original article >>
Report here if this news is invalid.

Related News

Nick Diaz's lawyer questions drug-testing methods, seeks settlement with NAC

  • 14 days ago
  • 13 views

Nick Diaz's attorney and the Nevada Athletic Commission (NAC) are in discussion about a settlement in the Diaz drug case. On Friday, Diaz's disciplinary hearing was postponed for another month after read news >>

Rape, battery charges filed against TUF contestant dismissed without prejudice

  • 21 hours ago
  • 104 views

After nearly six months of legal headaches, former Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) light heavyweight hopeful and Ultimate Fighter (TUF) 19 contestant Douglas Sparks can get back to a normal life read news >>

Stream or download MMAjunkie Radio #1963 with Dan Henderson, Stipe Miocic

  • 10 days ago
  • 2 views

Stream or download Monday’s edition of MMAjunkie Radio with Dan Henderson and Stipe Miocic.Filed under: MMAjunkie Radio, News, Radio, UFC read news >>

Nick Diaz rocks Ralek Gracie with body shot

  • 21 days ago
  • 1694 views

Don't throw spinning sh*t when you spar Nick Diaz. In a video released Friday night, Cesar Gracie found an "old tape" showing Diaz rocking Ralek Gracie with a body shot during a training session. Che read news >>

Nick Diaz wants to rematch Anderson Silva in a ring ... not UFC's 'dog cage'

  • 24 days ago
  • 41 views

Woof, woof. Nick Diaz still believes he won his fight against Anderson Silva at UFC 183 earlier this year. Even though the Octagon-side judges all came to the conclusion that "The Spider" did enough read news >>

Terrion Ware Ready to Claim RFA Title, Fight for UFC by Year’s End

  • 24 days ago
  • 0 views

Terrion Ware intends to claim the bantamweight champion in the only all-RFA bout at Friday's Legacy FC vs. RFA event on AXS TV. read news >>

Video: Nick Diaz TKOs Ralek Gracie with body shot

  • 20 days ago
  • 738 views

Cesar Gracie posted an old training video of Nick Diaz sparring with Ralek Gracie. It didn't go well for Gracie. Everyone loves a good Nick Diaz video, right? Well Cesar Gracie agrees, so he recently read news >>

Nick Diaz passed two out of three drug tests on night of UFC 183

  • 25 days ago
  • 43 views

Recent news has surfaced regarding Nick Diaz's drug tests surrounding his theatric clash with Anderson Silva at UFC 183. The UFC 183 drug scandal involving both Nick Diaz and Anderson Silva set the M read news >>

NSAC overhauls drug testing policy, implements multiyear suspensions for steroid users

  • 14 days ago
  • 7 views

Consider the hammer dropped. Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC) today (Fri., May 15, 2015) announced a new-and-improved drug testing policy, one that is designed to deter -- and severely punish read news >>

Travis Browne not a fan of new NSAC drug testing policy or people 'whining' about UFC-Reebok deal

  • 10 days ago
  • 2 views

Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC) recently overhauled its drug testing policy and is now poised to bench athletes who use performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) for up to three years for their firs read news >>