#UFC 300 #Max Holloway #Justin Gaethje #UFC 299 #Alexsandro Pereira #UFC 301 #Jamahal Hill #UFC on ABC 6 #Charles Oliveira #Arman Tsarukyan #UFC on ESPN 55 #UFC 298 #UFC 295 #UFC 302 #UFC on ESPN 56 #PFL 3 2024 Regular Season #Weili Zhang #PFL 2 2024 Regular Season #Xiao Nan Yang #UFC Fight Night 240

M-1 Exec: Promotion Plans to Enforce Dutch Verdict against Vasilevsky in United States



On March 15, M-1 Global was awarded a judgment in a Dutch court against former light heavyweight champion Vyacheslav Vasilevsky and will now seek to uphold that ruling in the United States.

Vasilevsky, 23, signed with Bellator Fighting Championships this past fall and recently made his promotional debut in the Season 6 middleweight tournament quarterfinals on March 16. Now residing in New Jersey on a work visa, the fighter has been ordered to pay the Russian promotion €1,000 for each day he breached his contract and €5,000 for each day he competes for another promotion.

According to M-1 Global Director of Operations Evgeni Kogan, Vasilevsky remains an M-1 fighter until early 2013 due to a champion’s clause in the fighter’s contract. Kogan contends that the clause was activated twice -- once when “Slava” became the M-1 Selection Eastern Europe champion in August 2010, and once when he won the world light heavyweight title four months later at M-1 Challenge 22.

Kogan says that he attempted to contact Bellator to notify the organization that Vasilevsky was under contract with M-1, but that his attempts proved fruitless.

“We have tried many times to talk to Bellator, to [Bellator CEO] Bjorn [Rebney], etc.,” Kogan told Sherdog.com via email last week. “I have personally emailed and called [Rebney] a number of times to try to get a dialogue going, to work things out without involving the legal system. We are open to sharing fighters [and] always have been. Most of our fighters sometimes fight outside of M-1.

“Instead of talking to us, though, all our contact with Bellator results in letters from their lawyers. Every single call, email, etc., results in a formal letter from their lawyers,” Kogan continued. “We feel this isn't conducive to any kind of relationship. Actually, it's very arrogant and insulting. Now we are going to get the Dutch judgment upheld in U.S. court and protect our rights to promote Vasilevsky.”

When asked to forward a copy of the fighter’s contract on the condition that it would not be published, Kogan declined, stating that the contract is an internal matter. Instead, the M-1 exec forwarded to Sherdog a copy of the signed judgment delivered in the Court of the City of Amsterdam as evidence that Vasilevsky remains under contract with the promotion.

When asked why M-1 chose to file suit in the Netherlands rather than in Russia or the United States, Kogan stated that the jurisdiction of the promotion’s contract with the fighter is in the Netherlands, where the M-1 head office is located.

On Vasilevsky’s side, the fighter’s manager, Sam Kardan, has been quoted as stating that he and his fighter were unaware of M-1’s legal action. Kogan disagrees, asserting that Vasilevsky was served documents notifying the fighter of the proceedings on March 2. Kogan forwarded to Sherdog a confirmation email sent to M-1 from DGR Legal, a New Jersey-based legal services company, alerting M-1 that the fighter had been served.

It is not yet clear how the court’s judgment will affect Vasilevsky’s future in the short term. Though Bellator has declined to comment on the situation in recent weeks, the promotion has nonetheless booked “Slava” to appear in the middleweight semifinals against Maiquel Falcao on April 20.

While Kogan declined to reveal specifics regarding the organization’s intent to have the Dutch ruling upheld in the United States, the M-1 executive was clear about the promotion’s stance on Vasilevsky competing for any other organization.

“Vasilevsky will not fight in other organizations besides M-1,” Kogan stated. “We tried to resolve this with Vasilevsky himself a number of times and with Bellator a number of times. Now the time for mutual resolution has ended, much to our disappointment, and we will move ahead with having the Dutch judgment upheld.”

view original article >>
Report here if this news is invalid.

Comments

Show Comments

Search for:

Related Videos