I'm not a fan of stoppages from people being punched in the arm when they're covered up. I can't help but think that the amount of time to wait before stopping a fight due to unanswered strikes should be longer if they're not doing damage... I mean, sure you have a dominant position, but to me it's not much different than outwrestling someone without landing strikes. They don't stop a fight just because one person is being dominated by wrestling, so why should they stop it when there are unanswered strikes which look like they're not actually doing damage?

@ Drozd
I agree. I think in this sytuation referee stop the fight to early!

I agree but in this situation it was more to do with the position they were in combined with the unanswerd strikes the referee saw that he was not even attemptin to escape, change postion or even move he had his back turned face down covered up granted the strikes were not concusive but the entire situation is a form of giving up on Seths part

Good comment there Dave.

I always liked Petruzelli, but he's career is done.