Vancouver Commission Comments on UFC 131 Elkins vs. Omigawa Decision


  • Share on Tumblr
  • submit to reddit

Judging is currently one of the most heated subjects of debate in the world of mixed martial arts. This past weekend’s UFC 131 in Vancouver only served to fan the flames.

Darren Elkins and Michihiro Omigawa at UFC 131

Darren Elkins and Michihiro Omigawa at UFC 131

There were several decisions brought into question at Rogers Arena, but none that rivaled the backlash over the night’s opening bout between Darren Elkins and Michihiro Omigawa, which aired live on Facebook and YouTube.

It was a back-and-forth fight with both fighters getting in their licks, though most people watching felt Omigawa had bested his opponent. In the end, however, all three judges scored the bout in Elkins’ favor, two of them 29-28, the third 30-27.

As soon as Elkins was declared the winner the backlash began. The online forums and, of course, Twitter, blew up with comments decrying the decision. Not easily missed among those incredulous over the decision was UFC president Dana White.

“Then you’ve got the Omigawa fight, where this guy loses the fight and Joe Silva said he was pulling a (Kazushi) Sakuraba and wasn’t going to leave the Octagon. He was going to stay in there, Joe had to beg him to leave,” said White after the post-fight press conference, discussing his criticism of the state of MMA judging.

“We’re going to pay him his win money. I don’t care what the judge said; he won the fight. I say he won, overruled.”

That of course takes care of Omigawa’s pocketbook, but it doesn’t change his official record, which now reflects back-to-back losses in the Octagon following a five-fight winning streak.

The backlash over the decision was strong enough that the Vancouver Athletic Commission decided to comment on the scoring of the fight.

“In the first round, Elkins backed Omigawa up with punches the entire round. He controlled the center of the cage. He was throwing a lot more shots, and landing more — and in combination,” Commissioner Jonathan Tweedale told MMAWeekly.com via email, commenting on behalf of the commission.

“If there is any controversy as to the outcome of the fight it must be because of the second round. That was a very challenging round to score. An argument can be made in favor of either fighter.

“Elkins landed more punches. At one point, when Omigawa came forward, he was stopped dead in his tracks by Elkins’ combination punches, and at another point he was slightly buckled. Due to Omigawa’s unusual stance and balance, it was difficult to tell exactly whether he was rocked by some of these shots. However, you could see Omigawa’s leg bend, and the control shift to Elkins as he landed the combo, stopping Omigawa in his tracks, taking the center of the cage, and going on the attack again.

“These sequences, as well as the total effective strikes landed, could reasonably warrant awarding the round to Elkins. Elkins didn’t land many more than Omigawa, but he did land more.  (The Fightmetric numbers agree.) As to the blood – it represents something, but a cut can be caused by a glancing blow, and some fighters just cut more readily than others.

“That’s a round about which reasonable people can disagree. Close rounds like Round 2 of Omigawa vs. Elkins serve as useful examples for discussion, to assist in refining and evolving the community’s understanding of the scoring criteria, generally. And that is a good thing for the sport.”

Tweedale fell short of giving his personal opinion on the decision, but more or less opened the floor for debate over the criteria used in the 10-point must system of scoring that has been carried over from the boxing world.

The official Elkins vs. Omigawa scorecard. (Click to enlarge)

Under the 10-point must system that most people are used to, a fighter is awarded scores per round then those scores are added up at the end of the fight to declare a winner.

There isn’t much separation in scoring, however. For instance, Fighter A could win two very close rounds by executing a couple more techniques in each round than Fighter B. The score for those rounds would be 10-9 in Fighter A’s favor, giving him a 20-18 lead going into the third stanza. Fighter B could then dominate the third round from bell to bell, maybe causing Fighter A to bleed profusely, but not necessarily put Fighter A in extreme danger of being finished. Fighter B, in such an instance, is often awarded a 10-9 round, thus losing the fight 29-28.

That’s when the backlash begins because of Fighter B’s strong finish, leaving the final impression in people’s minds that he dominated the fight. But under the 10-point must system, Fighter B loses the fight.

Is the Elkins vs. Omigawa decision that type of situation? Or did Omigawa get robbed?

The floor is obviously wide open to debate on that fight and the subject of scoring in general. And it’s a debate that isn’t likely to go away anytime soon.

Got something to say? Weigh in with a thought of your own in the comments section below.

Ken Pishna is the managing editor of MMAWeekly.com.
Follow
@KenPishna on Twitter or e-mail Ken a question or comment.

Follow MMAWeekly.com on Twitter and Facebook.

view original article >>

Related News

  • 26 days ago
  • 51 views

LAS VEGAS – Chris Weidman defended his UFC middleweight title with a unanimous decision win over Lyoto Machida on Saturday at UFC 175. Take a look at the varied scores from the fight.Filed under: News, UFC read news >>

  • 26 days ago
  • 42 views

UFC President Dana White believes Vitor Belfort is next in line for Chris Weidman's middleweight title but has to wait and see how things unfold with the Nevada State Athletic Commission. Dana White believes the logical opponent for Chris Weidman is the same one that was initially supposed to face: Vitor Belfort. Although it seems like an obvious suggestion, the Brazilian is in quite a problematic situation with the Nevada State Athletic Commission, which could complicate matter significantly if read news >>

  • 22 days ago
  • 54 views

Video: Lorenzo Fertitta (via YouTube) explains to FOX Sports why he had no other option but to postpone UFC 176, which was set to go down on Aug. 2, 2014, after Jose Aldo suffered a neck injury that forced him out of his title fight vs. Chad Mendes. read news >>

  • 20 days ago
  • 33 views

Because the bottom line ... is the bottom line. Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) light heavyweight kingpin Jon Jones is no stranger to fighting in Canada, having recently defended his 205-pound strap in Toronto on a couple of occasions against Lyoto Machida (UFC 140) and Vitor Belfort (UFC 152). And yes, even Alexander Gustafsson (UFC 165). But now that UFC has ordered a second go-round between "Bones" and "The Mauler," which could prove to be the promotion's most lucrative pay-per-view (PPV read news >>

  • 29 days ago
  • 42 views

The injury bug has bitten Jose Aldo once again. read news >>

  • 29 days ago
  • 31 views

UFC 176's main event featherweight title fight has been wiped out for now thanks to an injury to the champion. Filed under: Featured, News, UFC read news >>

  • 29 days ago
  • 66 views

It appears T.J. Dillashaw will defend his UFC title on home turf. Recently crowned UFC bantamweight champion after a dominant victory over Renan Barao, Dillashaw will likely have to do it again on August 30, as MMAFighting.com's Ariel Helwani reported on Wednesday's edition of UFC Tonight on FOX Sports 1 that the UFC is close to giving Barao an immediate at UFC 177 in Sacramento, California. UFC 177 was tentatively planned for Las Vegas, Nevada, but appears to be moving to the new champion's hom read news >>

  • 29 days ago
  • 42 views

Chris Wiedman defends his Middleweight belt against Lyoto Machida this weekend in Vegas along with Ronda Rousey against Alexis Davis. I hear your Dallas Stars won the NHL arms race yesterday. Congrats. Thanks buddy. Yes, Jim Nill is awesome. Getting Spezza to potentially center a second line with Hemsky and Nichushkin sounds fantastic with Tyler Seguin and Jamie Benn hopefully getting any one of the many right wingers in our system who can replace Chiasson. It's not enough to beat Chicago, St. L read news >>

  • 29 days ago
  • 21 views

Neither had the best performance of their careers at UFC 172 in Baltimore, Maryland this past May, but they may just get a chance to redeem themselves. Coincidentally, it could be a bout opposite one another. According to a report by Ariel Helwani on Fox Sports 1's UFC Tonight on Wednesday, a bout between UFC light heavyweight Glover Teixiera and Phil Davis has been discussed. Helwani noted the bout was possible and if it did take place, would be set for the fall of this year, but nothing has ye read news >>