Judging is currently one of the most heated subjects of debate in the world of mixed martial arts. This past weekend’s UFC 131 in Vancouver only served to fan the flames.

Darren Elkins and Michihiro Omigawa at UFC 131

Darren Elkins and Michihiro Omigawa at UFC 131

There were several decisions brought into question at Rogers Arena, but none that rivaled the backlash over the night’s opening bout between Darren Elkins and Michihiro Omigawa, which aired live on Facebook and YouTube.

It was a back-and-forth fight with both fighters getting in their licks, though most people watching felt Omigawa had bested his opponent. In the end, however, all three judges scored the bout in Elkins’ favor, two of them 29-28, the third 30-27.

As soon as Elkins was declared the winner the backlash began. The online forums and, of course, Twitter, blew up with comments decrying the decision. Not easily missed among those incredulous over the decision was UFC president Dana White.

“Then you’ve got the Omigawa fight, where this guy loses the fight and Joe Silva said he was pulling a (Kazushi) Sakuraba and wasn’t going to leave the Octagon. He was going to stay in there, Joe had to beg him to leave,” said White after the post-fight press conference, discussing his criticism of the state of MMA judging.

“We’re going to pay him his win money. I don’t care what the judge said; he won the fight. I say he won, overruled.”

That of course takes care of Omigawa’s pocketbook, but it doesn’t change his official record, which now reflects back-to-back losses in the Octagon following a five-fight winning streak.

The backlash over the decision was strong enough that the Vancouver Athletic Commission decided to comment on the scoring of the fight.

“In the first round, Elkins backed Omigawa up with punches the entire round. He controlled the center of the cage. He was throwing a lot more shots, and landing more — and in combination,” Commissioner Jonathan Tweedale told MMAWeekly.com via email, commenting on behalf of the commission.

“If there is any controversy as to the outcome of the fight it must be because of the second round. That was a very challenging round to score. An argument can be made in favor of either fighter.

“Elkins landed more punches. At one point, when Omigawa came forward, he was stopped dead in his tracks by Elkins’ combination punches, and at another point he was slightly buckled. Due to Omigawa’s unusual stance and balance, it was difficult to tell exactly whether he was rocked by some of these shots. However, you could see Omigawa’s leg bend, and the control shift to Elkins as he landed the combo, stopping Omigawa in his tracks, taking the center of the cage, and going on the attack again.

“These sequences, as well as the total effective strikes landed, could reasonably warrant awarding the round to Elkins. Elkins didn’t land many more than Omigawa, but he did land more.  (The Fightmetric numbers agree.) As to the blood – it represents something, but a cut can be caused by a glancing blow, and some fighters just cut more readily than others.

“That’s a round about which reasonable people can disagree. Close rounds like Round 2 of Omigawa vs. Elkins serve as useful examples for discussion, to assist in refining and evolving the community’s understanding of the scoring criteria, generally. And that is a good thing for the sport.”

Tweedale fell short of giving his personal opinion on the decision, but more or less opened the floor for debate over the criteria used in the 10-point must system of scoring that has been carried over from the boxing world.

The official Elkins vs. Omigawa scorecard. (Click to enlarge)

Under the 10-point must system that most people are used to, a fighter is awarded scores per round then those scores are added up at the end of the fight to declare a winner.

There isn’t much separation in scoring, however. For instance, Fighter A could win two very close rounds by executing a couple more techniques in each round than Fighter B. The score for those rounds would be 10-9 in Fighter A’s favor, giving him a 20-18 lead going into the third stanza. Fighter B could then dominate the third round from bell to bell, maybe causing Fighter A to bleed profusely, but not necessarily put Fighter A in extreme danger of being finished. Fighter B, in such an instance, is often awarded a 10-9 round, thus losing the fight 29-28.

That’s when the backlash begins because of Fighter B’s strong finish, leaving the final impression in people’s minds that he dominated the fight. But under the 10-point must system, Fighter B loses the fight.

Is the Elkins vs. Omigawa decision that type of situation? Or did Omigawa get robbed?

The floor is obviously wide open to debate on that fight and the subject of scoring in general. And it’s a debate that isn’t likely to go away anytime soon.

Got something to say? Weigh in with a thought of your own in the comments section below.

Ken Pishna is the managing editor of MMAWeekly.com.
Follow
@KenPishna on Twitter or e-mail Ken a question or comment.

Follow MMAWeekly.com on Twitter and Facebook.

view original article >>

Report here if this news is invalid.

Related News

UFC Fight Night 88 Medical Suspensions: Four Fighters Face Six-Month Layoffs

  • 26 days ago
  • 4 views

The Nevada State Athletic Commission released the medical suspensions stemming from UFC Fight Night 88: Almeida vs. Garbrandt on Thursday. read news >>

Nate Diaz vs. Conor McGregor II Announced for UFC 202: Latest Comments, Reaction

  • 24 days ago
  • 36 views

After plenty of posturing by all parties involved, the UFC confirmed Saturday night Conor McGregor will return to the Octagon for a rematch with Nate Diaz, per UFC commentator Jon Anik. The two will read news >>

Brock Lesnar Will Fight at UFC 200: Latest Details, Comments and Reaction

  • 24 days ago
  • 40 views

Brock Lesnar last stepped into the Octagon in December 2011, but the former UFC heavyweight champion is ready to resume his MMA career. The UFC announced Lesnar has agreed to return for a fight at UF read news >>

MMA Writer Ariel Helwani Comments on Being Escorted Out of UFC 199

  • 23 days ago
  • 741 views

MMA Fighting's Ariel Helwani spoke out Sunday after he tweeted during UFC 199 on Saturday night that the UFC had pulled his credential and banned him for life. In an email to Sports Illustrated's Ric read news >>

MMA Writer Ariel Helwani Comments on Being Escorted Out of UFC 199

  • 23 days ago
  • 16 views

MMA Fighting's Ariel Helwani spoke out Sunday after he tweeted during UFC 199 on Saturday night that the UFC had pulled his credential and banned him for life. In an email to Sports Illustrated's Ric read news >>

Brock Lesnar vs. Mark Hunt Announced for UFC 200: Latest Comments and Reaction

  • 23 days ago
  • 809 views

Late last year, Brock Lesnar said he felt he got "robbed" by diverticulitis that cost him the prime of his UFC career. Now, as he prepares for a one-off return at UFC 200, Lesnar's ready to prove to read news >>

Dana White Comments on Lifetime Ban of Ariel Helwani for Brock Lesnar Report

  • 22 days ago
  • 1986 views

UFC President Dana White confirmed that longtime MMA journalist Ariel Helwani has been banned from receiving press credentials after breaking the news on two huge fights without contacting the promot read news >>

Mark Hunt Comments on Brock Lesnar's Drug Testing Exemption

  • 20 days ago
  • 641 views

It didn't take long for the war of words between Brock Lesnar and Mark Hunt to go from professionally combative to personal. Hunt, speaking to UFC Fight Week on Fox Sports, accused Lesnar of being on read news >>

Anthony Pettis Makes Featherweight Debut Versus Charles Oliveira at UFC Vancouver

  • 13 days ago
  • 36 views

Former lightweight champion Anthony Pettis will make his featherweight debut opposite Charles Oliveira when the UFC returns to Vancouver. read news >>

UFC Fight Night 93: Vancouver Event Page and Fight Card Rumors

  • 13 days ago
  • 15 views

Line-up for UFC Fight Night 93 at the Rogers Arena in Vancouver, Canada on August 27. read news >>