Chris Weidman vs. Anderson Silva II could take place at UFC 168


chris-weidman-17.jpgThe UFC’s traditional year-end event could very well have a new headliner if UFC President Dana White has his way.

White today told the Los Angeles Times’ Lance Pugmire that he’s targeting UFC 168, which takes place Dec. 28 at Las Vegas’ MGM Grand Garden Arena, for the rematch of this past weekend’s UFC 162 headliner between Chris Weidman (10-0 MMA, 6-0 UFC) and Anderson Silva (33-5 MMA, 16-1 UFC). MMAjunkie.com (www.mmajunkie.com) has since confirmed White’s intentions with a UFC official.

“@danawhite just told me he’s so amped about @SpiderAnderson @ChrisWeidmanUFC rematch, he’s thinking of moving it to Dec. 28,” Pugmire wrote on Twitter. “@danawhite said he’d shift @RondaRousey @MieshaTate bout to Super Bowl weekend, just considering it now.”

Following this past Saturday night’s historic UFC 162 event in Las Vegas, White officially announced UFC 168 would see women’s bantamweight champion Ronda Rousey (7-0 MMA, 1-0 UFC) would face former Strikeforce title holder Miesha Tate (13-4 MMA, 0-1 UFC) in the evening’s main event. However, he’s since reconsidered his position and it seems will now attempt to book Weidman vs. Silva II for the night’s featured slot.

Weidman has already expressed his desire to face Silva a second time after scoring a second-round knockout over “The Spider” at UFC 162 to become just the sixth middleweight champion in UFC history. The former champ has suggested he’s not interested in the rematch right now, but White believes time will see the Brazilian reconsider his position and seek redemption against the undefeated Weidman.

If Weidman vs. Silva II does take place at UFC 168, the Rousey vs. Tate bout would likely head an as-yet-unnamed UFC event that’s scheduled for Feb. 1 at Prudential Center in Newark, N.J. However, UFC execs to officially make the switch.

For the latest on UFC 168 and UFC in Newark, stay tuned to the UFC Rumors section of the site.

(Pictured: Chris Weidman)

view original article >>
Report here if this news is invalid.

Related News

  • 28 days ago
  • 110 views

Appearing on ESPN's SportsCenter, UFC president Dana White officially announced the anticipated bout between former UFC middleweight champion Anderson Silva and former Strikeforce welterweight champi read news >>

  • 26 days ago
  • 43 views

Chris Weidman's busy defending his title. Anderson Silva's busy preparing for his comeback. Vitor Belfort's busy brushing off his critics. Luke Rockhold's busy vying to replace Belfort as one of his read news >>

  • 28 days ago
  • 946 views

After a week of teasing it, the UFC has officially booked Anderson Silva vs. Nick Diaz. Today, Dana White appeared on ESPN with a fight announcement that had been teased all week. Anderson Silva will read news >>

  • 28 days ago
  • 52 views

Super Bowl weekend just got a hell of a lot more super. Anderson Silva and Nick Diaz will make their long-awaited returns to the Octagon, as the two former champions have men been booked to face off read news >>

  • 28 days ago
  • 70 views

The worldwide leader for mixed martial arts and UFC news, MMA News, UFC Rumors, MMA Rankings, Interviews, Videos, UFC Results, and UFC Blog read news >>

  • 6 days ago
  • 77 views

Could Anderson Silva and Nick Diaz be fighting for a shot at UFC gold when they meet early next year? UFC President Dana White can’t say for sure, but it’s certainly possible. Filed under: MMA Rumors read news >>

  • 27 days ago
  • 416 views

Check out the social media reaction from fighters, media members and celebrities after Dana White announced the January superfight between Anderson Silva and Nick Diaz. Filed under: News, UFC read news >>

  • 27 days ago
  • 61 views

When I jokingly said on The MMA Beat that if Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva was booked, I'd have to question my religious beliefs, I never thought people would take it seriously. But many did, and I'm read news >>

  • 18 days ago
  • 10 views

When we heard that the UFC was working to make Ronda Rousey-Gina Carano a reality, we should have known then that things were changing, perhaps by necessity. Since the beginning of 2014, the pay-per- read news >>